I picked up a 50ct. box of 160 Nosler Accubonds, but I'm hesitant to burn up the powder and projectiles on workup when all I have is 50 bullets. But I really want to find a bullet from the 160 class that my more mature rifle likes.

Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the precise copy of H4831. Bodily, it's got a shorter grain size, thus, the designation SC or limited Reduce. The shorter, more compact kernels enable the powder to stream in the powder measures much more easily, helping to alleviate the consistent cutting of granules.

This is without doubt one of the most important causes reloaders are admonished to employ new data only; and to begin low every time you get a whole new large amount of powder. You don't actually know (Until the business informs you so) that the new wide range of powder was even built at precisely the same manufacturing unit because the powder you acquire a couple of years in the past.

243, and a number of the loads I've commenced with encompass, you guessed it, H-4831sc. This time I am going to shoot the IMR7828 loads initially, followed by the W780 loads just so there will not be any surprises in the event the H-4831sc loads demonstrate a shotgun pattern! Who understands, I just could locate a use for it In the end.

Newbie to reloading. This will likely be used for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I was able to get my arms on a few lbs of h4831.

Did you ever try out H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I've a 300wsm now. Capturing 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with conventional chamber. Questioning What to anticipate with 215 bergers with H4331sc?

You might have to produce a handful of a lot more posts for getting cleared to accomplish PM's. As you get to that standing I might publish while in the categorised reloading segment to see if any individual is in your area for a trade.

and you should spend money on some new load data books. powder composition and chemistry can does alter over the years. 4831 powder of h4831sc a long time in the past just isn't similar as exactly what is currently available. that's why an individual serious about reloading safely will likely have the most current load data books to seek advice from.

WA I would endorse a slower burner that could give greater case density like H1000 or IMR 7977, particularly when you are loading heavies extensive.

It can be humorous how over time loading countless distinct cartridges in numerous rifles which i haven't gained satisfactory conclude effects with H-4831 or maybe the short-Lower Edition.

Operate your h4831 vs h4831sc load up with the particular powder (sc or normal) and lot you are applying while. Very same burn rate does not imply h4831sc it's going to behave "precisely" the same. I have noticed over one hundred fps difference between sc and mil-surp many H4831.

The "SC" means Small Minimize. I have never observed a difference between possibly powder dut I don't Believe I might combine them.

Am i able to presume that H4831 may be substituted for H4831sc ? I am aware the Actual physical difference but will it have an affect on the burn or velocity? I do think not but I'm not a hundred% certain.

If I have a pound or two of the powder and acquire far more of exactly the same, only a unique great deal range, I will combine all of them up to ensure that I've a homogeneous batch of powder with which to operate.