Since there isn't going to look like any "Formal" Load Data in existence for this Load, can some of you present a place to begin with this mix and matters to consider when Doing the job this Load up?

When it comes to bench relaxation matches, Hodgdon® rifle powders have posted much more wins than all other propellants put together. A great extruded powder, it flows correctly and with ease by way of measures and delivers match-quality accuracy when put to make use of.

The point that the H4831 is without a doubt a slower burning powder is specifically why you happen to be seeing greater velocities obtained with that powder, versus what you've witnessed With all the IMR stuff. Also excellent powder, but somewhat much better suited to a bit scaled-down situations using a little bit fewer capacity.

Run your load up with the particular powder (sc or frequent) and great deal you will be utilizing however. Identical burn fee does not imply it is going to behave "accurately" a similar. I've found about a hundred fps distinction between sc and mil-surp plenty of H4831.

My encounter would be that the SC and SSC loaded to the identical pounds because the extensive Minimize shows a reduced velocity.

Apache Jct Superior data, I have jars of both equally and often puzzled if they may be reloaded With all the exact same recipes should really I run out of 1 or the other.

If there is no load data it truly is since this powder will not be well suited for this cartridge. Generally a single will never come across a person powder to suit all cartridges, and the family members of cartridges with the particular powder (4831SC) that you are asking h4831sc load data about does not get the job done.

Im beneath the comprehending I would like to use h4831sc. I've read through that these powders are similar Aside from the shorter grain size on the sc. Should I even now be looking out for h4381sc?

Any load data to help that? My to start with imagined is it's not gonna burn every one of the way and velocities will be gradual and in all places. Is likely to be a nice fireworks Exhibit!

The 55grs is all that I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I think that they may have slowed down the swift to point out that their rifles are better. It bug the hell out of me. I know much better. That's why I don't at any time toss out my more mature manuals. I do invest in new guide continuously to remain up on new chambers and there loading. I take advantage of this 39grs in summers @ one hundred+ degrees without any problems.

Kansas Metropolis, MO I might seize whatever is obtainable today. I’ve used the two however with my drop by load and didn’t see anything distinct functionality clever.

Following studying this short article (and many Many others, but this just one is considered the most data driven with various accredited shooters) I have stopped stressing about touching or currently being inside a magical length with the lands, and started loading where I could enhance several aspects of h4831sc a load. Just my .02, ideally you will get something to operate for ya.

I typically usually have the sc Model. Using a powder evaluate it hangs up a lot less on account of shorter kernels and I believe enables more dependable metering so considerably less time you take trickling in the final bit of demand to generate excess weight. So mainly the SC saves you times

IMR4831 and H4831SC are various. The place you will be bewildering it and believing that it really is shut is H4831 and H4831SC are very related. Those people two are just h4831sc about precisely the same other than H4831SC is designed to scaled-down grains so it meters simpler.